>size="2" color="#808080"] The context of
>“my God” is founded on
>OT linguistics
"Theos mou"
Does not refer to judges here or in John 10.
Yhl0w in Peshitta'kritai' as in Lk 11:19 actually means judges.
similar to John
>10:34 where Jesus was referring
>to Israel’s judges as “gods”
>= theos that is they
>had the authority of life
>and death over their brethren
>as though they were very
>deity.
30 I and my Father are one.
31 Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him.
32 Jesus answered them, Many good works have I shewed you from my Father; for which of those works do ye stone me?
33 The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God.
34 Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods?
35 If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken;
36 Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God?
The context says your WRONG AGAIN!!!!!!
>“God of gods” but here
>God is plural
Ha. You are too funny. They were enraged before he referred to them as gods in the plural,
because of his 'blasphemy', equating himself with God. This is not hard stuff.
>Confusing ah!
On the contrary this is SOOOO simple.
Now putting
>this together for your understanding
>if angels can be called
>elohim and leaders/rulers can be
>called elohim, all these supposed
>‘mighty ones’ are only acting
>on deities power not their
>own. Likewise, Jesus always gave
>his Father the credit for
>all that he did under
>the influence of the “spirit
>of holiness’ and to some
>extent ‘without limit’. So yes,
>doubting Mar Thomas your mentor
>in the east saw Jesus
>as a great mighty one
>among them. And when
>Jesus returns to this earth
>he will come with great
>authority to judge mankind as
>deities representative.
And Peter Pan will come and take us away to Neverland.
Now
>that I have blown you
>guys away
That's for sure. You are all by yourself.
>And please refrain from calling me
>something or other, you have
>no idea of who or
>what a christadelphians is, probably
>more complicated
Yes, and it is a good thing God is simnple
>And ahki Iakov who’s the bigger
>liar P-75 or P-46?
Perhaps you could put your rebuttals in a clear concise format? Explain the p-75 p46 and I will help you as much as I am able with the help of Dr Fee of course.
BTW. You again danced around previous questions and comments.
Here's another to add to the lengthening list.
John 14:26
But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you
Aba SENDS Rukha Qudsha in Meshikha's name?
And his role sounds much like Spirit of God in Tanakh.
Yes we are beginning to look at the third part of the Trinity now.
Shma Yisrael Adonai Eloheynu Adonai Ekhad.
Shlama,
Yaqub