Assyrian Forums
 Home  |  Ads  |  Partners  |  Sponsors  |  Contact  |  FAQs  |  About  
 
   Holocaust  |  History  |  Library  |  People  |  TV-Radio  |  Forums  |  Community  |  Directory
  
   General  |  Activism  |  Arts  |  Education  |  Family  |  Financial  |  Government  |  Health  |  History  |  News  |  Religion  |  Science  |  Sports
   Greetings · Shläma · Bärev Dzez · Säludos · Grüße · Shälom · Χαιρετισμοί · Приветствия · 问候 · Bonjour · 挨拶 · تبریکات  · Selamlar · अभिवादन · Groete · التّحيّات

'MOVIE REVIEW:

    Previous Topic Next Topic
Home Forums General Topic #97
Help Print Share
Kikia
 
Send email to KikiaSend private message to KikiaAdd Kikia to your contact list
 
Member:
Member Feedback

'MOVIE REVIEW:

Mar-07-2004 at 09:37 PM (UTC+3 Nineveh, Assyria)

MOVIE REVIEW
By Ivan Kakovitch

'The Passion of Christ'
An Unparalleled Once-In-A-Lifetime
Pictorial Presentation
of the Most Indelible Symbol of Christianity'

Let No One Write My Epitaph, But Mr. Mel Gibson, (Up Kha Nasha Khtamti La Katula, Shuk Min Miukra Mel Gibson}, would, be the words spoken by Jesus Christ himself, had he been able to see this splendidly produced pictorial Bible, and its Biblical version.

'The Passion of Christ' thrives on three levels of lecturing humanity and its concerns with faiths.

FIRSTLY. The portrayal of a man mostly admired by all universal standards, as well as universally most revered personage for the past 2,000 years--give and take a few hundred--is in itself a challenging of tasks undertaken by any of the predecessors of Mr. Gibson's presentation.

The man as we know as Jesus Christ, is humble, yet arrogant; polite, yet uncompromising; mesmerizing, yet humane; addictive, yet solvent; soft-spoken, yet ardent; and, derelict, yet promulgator.

Not a fraction of hesitation should persist in all those faithful in their religion, to avoid seeing this Biblical process, turned into a motion picture.

No one shall be offended, discouraged, disgusted, antagonized, and become downright disrespectful to the images portrayed, although bloody--sitting well with the mood and temperament of those eras--as they are simply projected to facilitate the continuity of the story, which is the omnipresent of the culmination of faith and belief in a predictable dogma, that is, a unified religious aspect for a large part of the world population of yore, today, and even tomorrow.

SECONDLY. The nostalgia for arts and science fluctuating throughout the film in the mode of transmitting the picture in its original languages, Aramaic, Hebrew and Latin, renders it as an emotional passage through the times and the avenues of momentous scripture-type realizations.

The music, the costumes, the mise-en-scene, the photography, the scope of lights and the shades over the insatiably staged scenes, topped by exceptional portrayal of the characters, familiar to all, perhaps, through the readings of the passages of the Bible, the emotions, the catapulting of characteristics of human behaviors, and, finally, best of all, the formidable epilogue of unconformity, compel the story more plausible that it could ever have been described on paper.

THIRDLY. 'The Passion of Christ' contains no defamatory tirades toward any society, religion, or any faiths or religions of yore or those of today.

It simply doesn't have to dwell into the lethargic state of mind of the community involved in the most analytic or arguable event overtaking their curiosity of the moment. The tempo of the multitudes is simply that of a passing of an enigmatically geared trial--not dissimilar to the ones we are faced from day to day--in which the parade of observers is merely that of uncontested thinkers.

The cast of thousands, is simply there as a decorum, with, of course, the exception of a few main characters surrounding the life and death of the man they knew as Jesus Christ.

The most astounding facet in the motion picture is that it does not analyze, or passes judgment on the perpetrators and procrastinators of life or death, nor does it discern the good and the evil.

THE MOST PROMINENT QUESTION
Does the film offend, in any way a nation or a religion? Yes, and No, would be an apt response.

YES, 'The Passion of Christ' depicts the Hebrew religious hierarchy as anachronistic and archaic in its precipitous verdict. How can we presuppose this?

NO, 'The Passion of Christ' in the same manner, reinforces the spectrum of humanity among all nations, even the Hebrews.

In view of the fact that the term 'Semite' is an uncontested Biblical, rather than a scientific nomenclature, and no science or scientist would infer as to the possibility that Noah's Arc, Noah and his sons, especially Shem--from which the word 'Semite' derives--were extant. Hence, the word 'Semite', being unordained, and nonsensical, therefore, there is no reason whatsoever to discuss the semantics of it being anti-Semitic.

CONCLUSION
'Passion of Christ' is a must see for all. All shall pass the ticket counters, on their way out, pensive and perhaps, even more humane. Most even will forget the $10 they paid to see the film, they could see in a few months for $1 on the Video.

Even this writer tried to remain nonchalant, to no avail.

Ivan Kakovitch
ivankakovitch@aol.com
Telephone: 714.236.4851

Address: POB 3256
Cypress, CA 90630-3256
USA


Alert   IP Print   Edit        Reply      Re-Quote Top

Forums Topics  Previous Topic Next Topic


Assyria \ã-'sir-é-ä\ n (1998)   1:  an ancient empire of Ashur   2:  a democratic state in Bet-Nahren, Assyria (northern Iraq, northwestern Iran, southeastern Turkey and eastern Syria.)   3:  a democratic state that fosters the social and political rights to all of its inhabitants irrespective of their religion, race, or gender   4:  a democratic state that believes in the freedom of religion, conscience, language, education and culture in faithfulness to the principles of the United Nations Charter — Atour synonym

Ethnicity, Religion, Language
» Israeli, Jewish, Hebrew
» Assyrian, Christian, Aramaic
» Saudi Arabian, Muslim, Arabic
Assyrian \ã-'sir-é-an\ adj or n (1998)   1:  descendants of the ancient empire of Ashur   2:  the Assyrians, although representing but one single nation as the direct heirs of the ancient Assyrian Empire, are now doctrinally divided, inter sese, into five principle ecclesiastically designated religious sects with their corresponding hierarchies and distinct church governments, namely, Church of the East, Chaldean, Maronite, Syriac Orthodox and Syriac Catholic.  These formal divisions had their origin in the 5th century of the Christian Era.  No one can coherently understand the Assyrians as a whole until he can distinguish that which is religion or church from that which is nation -- a matter which is particularly difficult for the people from the western world to understand; for in the East, by force of circumstances beyond their control, religion has been made, from time immemorial, virtually into a criterion of nationality.   3:  the Assyrians have been referred to as Aramaean, Aramaye, Ashuraya, Ashureen, Ashuri, Ashuroyo, Assyrio-Chaldean, Aturaya, Chaldean, Chaldo, ChaldoAssyrian, ChaldoAssyrio, Jacobite, Kaldany, Kaldu, Kasdu, Malabar, Maronite, Maronaya, Nestorian, Nestornaye, Oromoye, Suraya, Syriac, Syrian, Syriani, Suryoye, Suryoyo and Telkeffee. — Assyrianism verb

Aramaic \ar-é-'máik\ n (1998)   1:  a Semitic language which became the lingua franca of the Middle East during the ancient Assyrian empire.   2:  has been referred to as Neo-Aramaic, Neo-Syriac, Classical Syriac, Syriac, Suryoyo, Swadaya and Turoyo.

Please consider the environment when disposing of this material — read, reuse, recycle. ♻
AIM | Atour: The State of Assyria | Terms of Service