|
Nations and Nationalism
About
the book
Synopsis
"Gellner argues that nationalism is characteristic of industrial society, not solely because of economics, but also owing to the interaction of education, power, and culture." (Choice) Bibliography. Index.
Reviews
From D.T. Studlar - Choice Building upon his chapter on nationalism in Thought and Change {BRD 1965}, Gellner constructs a broad and stimulating theory of nationalism, useful both historically and contemporaneously. . . . He develops a typology of nationalism with appropriate examples, but more empirical applications would be helpful. This circumstantialist perspective on nationalism can be contrasted with the essentialist view of Dov Ronen, The Quest for Self-Determination {BRD 1980}. Despite inadequate footnotes and bibliography, the clear, concise language on a difficult subject makes this book suitable for both undergraduates and graduates.
From John Dunn - The Times Literary Supplement
While his model will hardly suffice to explain the history of nationalism and
may indeed offer rather little help in understanding some aspects of this which
we need to understand with particular urgency, Gellner does, as he claims,
provide a better explanation than anyone else has yet offered of why nationalism
is such a prominent principle of political legitimacy today. Nations and
Nationalism is a terse and forceful work. But although it is the product of
great intellectual energy and an impressive range of knowledge, it is not a
complete success. . . . The main weakness of {this} book as a whole is a failure
to maintain a clear and precise sense of just what it is seeking to explain.
From Geoff Eley - Contemporary Sociology
{This book} begins with a strong developmental distinction between 'structure'
and 'culture,' abstracted from a typological contrast between agrarian and
industrial societies. . . . {This} is a slightly frustrating book. The discrete
expositions are as good as one has come to expect from the author. But the
organizing distinction between 'agrarian' and 'industrial' society remains a
terribly blunt instrument and 'modernization' (which seems to be used
interchangeably with 'industrialization') is the usual portmanteau concept. We
should remain grateful for this new product of Gellner's restless and irreverent
theoretical mind. But it would be wonderful to see such an exquisite
intellectual draftsman muddy his hands in some history.
From Bernard Crick - New Statesman
This is the first book in a promising new series. . . . The general editor, R.I.
Moore, could not have found a more versatile specialist for the difficult task
of getting a modern reader to imagine what a flourishing world was like without
either nationalism or nation states, and of explaining how all this changed so
very recently in human history. All Gellner lacks is much interest in the
history either of ideas or of politics: these he tends to see as 'banana skin'
explanations of fundamental social conditions. . . . There is no discussion of
nationalism and racialism, the myth of common culture contrasted with the myth
of common blood. And if nationalism was not an invention, the speed of its
spread surely owed much to Napoleon and the tactics of the dynasties in
popularising resistance to him. Some contingencies are important. Our basic
dilemmas still mirror the Napoleonic contradictions of nationalism, the rights
of man, democracy, equality of opportunity and egalitarianism. So here are
brilliant, provocative and irritatingly incomplete notes towards what could have
been a great book. Is it unfair or unwise to ask for more?
Please help
support our website by purchasing this item using the link below. Thank you!
Nations
and Nationalism - Amazon's online bookstore.
Government Forum
Government and Political Information Archives